ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

UTA*×CILOS×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem19852016
Autor originalSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TipoAdditive utility disaggregation — LP from ordinal reference judgementsRelative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Fonte seminalSiskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. (1985). UTASTAR: An ordinal regression method for building additive value functions. Investigación Operativa link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados88
ResumoUTASTAR (UTA* — Additive utility disaggregation from reference ranking (revised UTA)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Siskos, Y., Yannacopoulos, D. in 1985. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: UTASTAR · CILOS. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare