ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

UCLA Prostate Cancer Index×FACT-Lung: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy×
ÁreaOncologiaOncologia
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem19981995
Autor originalLitwin, M. S., et al.David F. Cella, Ph.D.
TipoSelf-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
Fonte seminalLitwin, M. S., Hays, R. D., Fink, A., Ganz, P. A., Leake, B., & Brook, R. H. (1998). The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. Med Care, 36(7), 1002–1012. DOI ↗Cella, D. F., Bonomi, A. E., Lloyd, S. R., Tulsky, D. S., Kaplan, E., & Bonomi, P. (1995). Validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument for patients with lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 13(1), 142–153. link ↗
Outros nomesUCLA PCI, PCIFACT-L
Relacionados55
ResumoThe UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA PCI) is a 20-item, prostate-cancer-specific quality-of-life instrument focused on functional outcomes (urinary, sexual, bowel) rather than general cancer QoL. Developed by Litwin et al. in 1998, it has become the standard functional assessment tool in prostate cancer outcomes research, particularly for treatment comparison studies evaluating surgical vs. radiation outcomes.The FACT-Lung (FACT-L) is a lung-cancer-specific quality-of-life measure that combines a 27-item general cancer assessment with a 7-item lung cancer subscale. Developed by Cella et al. in 1995, it quantifies physical, emotional, social, and functional well-being specifically relevant to lung cancer patients. It is widely used in clinical trials and practice to assess treatment impact and symptom burden.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: UCLA Prostate Cancer Index · FACT-Lung. Recuperado em 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare