Comparar métodos

	Análise Cienciométrica em Fatias Temporais	Análise Bibliométrica
Área	Cientometria	Cientometria
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	1980s–1990s	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Autor original	Derived from scientometrics tradition; temporal slicing formalized in longitudinal bibliometric studies from the 1980s onward	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
Tipo	Quantitative longitudinal analysis	Quantitative literature analysis
Fonte seminal	Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Outros nomes	temporal scientometrics, period-based scientometric analysis, time-window scientometrics, longitudinal scientometric analysis	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Relacionados	6	6
Resumo	Time-sliced scientometric analysis divides a bibliographic corpus into discrete temporal windows — commonly five- or ten-year periods — and applies standard scientometric indicators (publication counts, citation rates, h-index, collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence) within each slice. By comparing results across slices, researchers can reconstruct how a scientific field has grown, shifted focus, formed new collaborations, or declined in influence over time. The approach combines the rigor of quantitative scientometrics with an explicit longitudinal dimension.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.