Comparar métodos

	Revisão de Mapeamento Fatiado no Tempo	Revisão de Escopo
Área	Cientometria	Cientometria
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	2000s–2010s	2005
Autor original	Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & Thomas	Hilary Arksey & Lisa O'Malley
Tipo	Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentation	Evidence synthesis review design
Fonte seminal	Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842	Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Outros nomes	temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping review	scoping study, literature scoping, evidence mapping review, rapid evidence map
Relacionados	6	6
Resumo	A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.	A scoping review is a systematic evidence-synthesis method that maps the breadth and nature of research on a topic — identifying key concepts, evidence types, and gaps — without necessarily appraising study quality or pooling effect sizes. Developed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and refined by Levac and colleagues (2010), it is particularly valuable for emerging or heterogeneous fields where a full systematic review would be premature or infeasible.