Comparar métodos

	Revisão de Mapeamento Fatiado no Tempo	Revisão de Mapeamento
Área	Cientometria	Cientometria
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	2000s–2010s	Late 1990s–2000s; major methodological formalization ~2010s
Autor original	Campbell Collaboration / Gough, Oliver & Thomas	Buckland & Gann (1998); formalized by systematic review community (Campbell Collaboration, Collaboration for Environmental Evidence)
Tipo	Evidence synthesis with temporal segmentation	Systematic evidence mapping methodology
Fonte seminal	Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1849204842	James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 7.
Outros nomes	temporal mapping review, time-period mapping review, longitudinal evidence map, chronological mapping review	evidence map, systematic map, research map, literature map
Relacionados	6	6
Resumo	A time-sliced mapping review is a systematic evidence synthesis that partitions the search period into discrete temporal segments — such as five-year intervals — and constructs a separate evidence map for each slice. By comparing maps across periods, researchers can chart how topics emerge, peak, decline, or transform within a research field, producing a longitudinal picture of knowledge structure that a single-point mapping review cannot provide.	A mapping review (also called a systematic map or evidence map) is a form of systematic review that aims to chart the extent, range, and nature of evidence on a broad topic rather than synthesize findings into a single pooled answer. It categorizes studies by key dimensions — such as intervention type, population, outcome, and study design — and presents the resulting landscape visually and tabularly so that researchers and practitioners can identify clusters of evidence, knowledge gaps, and priorities for future primary research or deeper synthesis.