ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Análise Bibliométrica por Fatias Temporais×Análise Bibliométrica×
ÁreaCientometriaCientometria
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem2000s–2010s (as an explicit methodological variant)1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Autor originalDerived from classical bibliometrics (Price, Garfield); explicitly formalised in longitudinal studies by Zhao & Strotmann (2008) and othersAlan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
TipoQuantitative scientometric analysisQuantitative literature analysis
Fonte seminalZhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070–2086. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
Outros nomeslongitudinal bibliometrics, temporal bibliometric analysis, diachronic bibliometrics, time-window bibliometric analysisbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Relacionados66
ResumoTime-sliced bibliometric analysis partitions a literature corpus into consecutive time windows and applies standard bibliometric indicators (publication counts, citation patterns, co-authorship networks, keyword frequencies) within each window. By comparing results across slices, researchers can document how a field's productivity, intellectual structure, and thematic focus have shifted over time — providing a diachronic rather than static view of scholarly output.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Time-sliced Bibliometric Analysis · Bibliometric Analysis. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare