Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Estrutura de Domínios Teóricos (TDF)× | Tradução do Conhecimento× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Ciência da implementação | Ciência da implementação |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2005 | 2004 |
| Autor original≠ | Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., et al. | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) |
| Tipo | Framework | Framework |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Lawton, R., Parker, D., & Walker, A. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14(1), 26-33. DOI ↗ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2004). Knowledge Translation Strategy 2004-2009. CIHR, Ottawa. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes | TDF, theoretical domains, behaviour change framework | KT, evidence-to-practice, research-to-practice |
| Relacionados | 5 | 5 |
| Resumo≠ | The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a 14-domain model that integrates constructs from 33 behavior change and implementation theories to identify barriers and facilitators to professional and public behavior change. Developed by Michie et al. (2005) to provide a practical tool for implementation scientists and behavior change specialists, the TDF helps systematically assess 'why' healthcare professionals or patients do (or do not) adopt evidence-based practices, and guides the design of tailored behavior change interventions. | Knowledge Translation (KT) is the systematic synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of research findings to improve health outcomes and healthcare practice. First formalized by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in 2004, KT recognizes that evidence generation alone does not automatically change clinical or policy behaviour, and structures a purposeful process to bridge the gap between research and practice. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|