Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Crítica Textual× | Análise do Discurso× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área≠ | Métodos de campo | Pesquisa qualitativa |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | Antiquity; modern systematic method c. 1850s (Lachmann) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Autor original≠ | Classical philologists (Karl Lachmann foremost in systematic method) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Tipo≠ | Humanistic / philological research method | Method |
| Fonte seminal≠ | West, M. L. (1973). Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts. Teubner. ISBN: 978-3519074014 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | lower criticism, editorial criticism, philological criticism, manuscript criticism | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 2 |
| Resumo≠ | Textual criticism is a systematic philological method for identifying, comparing, and evaluating variant readings across multiple manuscript or print witnesses of a text in order to reconstruct the most accurate version of the original — or the author's intended — text. Applied since antiquity to classical, biblical, and literary works, it remains the foundational editorial method in classical studies, biblical scholarship, medieval studies, and critical editing of literary works. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|