ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Swing Weighting×Método Alternativo de Ordenação por Ranking com Normalização em Duas Etapas×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem19862022
Autor originalvon Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipoWeight_Subjective (swing from worst to best, relative gain assessment)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Fonte seminalvon Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press ISBN: 978-0521271073Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados88
ResumoSWING (Swing Weighting — importance weights derived from worst-to-best swing utility gains) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W. in 1986. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: SWING · AROMAN. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare