ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Particionamento por Equivalência em Testes×Métricas de Complexidade de Software×
ÁreaEngenharia de softwareEngenharia de software
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem19791976
Autor originalGlenford MyersThomas J. McCabe
Tipopartitioning strategyquantitative measurement
Fonte seminalMyers, G. J. (1979). The Art of Software Testing. John Wiley & Sons. link ↗McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗
Outros nomesequivalence partitioning, BVA, boundary value analysiscode complexity analysis, complexity measurement
Relacionados44
ResumoEquivalence partitioning divides input domains into equivalence classes—sets of inputs expected to behave identically—then selects test cases from each class. Introduced by Myers (1979), this technique reduces test cases while maintaining effectiveness. Boundary value analysis (BVA) complements partitioning by testing values at partition boundaries where failures often occur.Software complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Equivalence Partitioning Testing · Software Complexity Metrics. Recuperado em 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare