ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Social Construction of Technology×Controversy Mapping×
ÁreaScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem19842010
Autor originalTrevor Pinch & Wiebe BijkerBruno Latour (Sciences Po médialab); codified by Tommaso Venturini
TipoConstructivist theory of technological developmentQualitative descriptive method and pedagogy
Fonte seminalPinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399-441. DOI ↗Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI ↗
Outros nomesSCOT, Social constructivism of technology, Interpretive flexibility analysisCartography of controversies, Mapping scientific controversies, Controversy analysis
Relacionados44
ResumoThe Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a constructivist framework holding that technological artefacts are shaped by the interpretations and negotiations of relevant social groups rather than by technical logic alone. Introduced by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker in 1984, it shows that an artefact has 'interpretive flexibility'—different groups see different problems and solutions in it—until a process of closure stabilises one design as the obvious one.Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Social Construction of Technology · Controversy Mapping. Recuperado em 2026-06-25 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare