Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Social Audit× | Community Scorecard× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Development Studies | Development Studies |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2005 | 2002 |
| Autor original≠ | Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), Rajasthan, India; institutionalised in India's MGNREGA | CARE Malawi (developed within the social accountability movement); disseminated by the World Bank |
| Tipo≠ | Public accountability and verification method | Community-based social accountability monitoring tool |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Centre for Good Governance (2005). Social Audit: A Toolkit - A Guide for Performance Improvement and Outcome Measurement. Hyderabad: Centre for Good Governance. link ↗ | CARE (2013). The Community Score Card (CSC): A Generic Guide for Implementing CARE's CSC Process to Improve Quality of Services. Atlanta: CARE. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes | Social Audit, Public Social Audit, Jan Sunwai, Community Social Audit | CSC, Community Score Card, Community-Based Scorecard, Community Performance Scorecard |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | A Social Audit is a method of public accountability in which citizens collectively examine official records of public spending and works and verify them against physical reality, culminating in an open public hearing where discrepancies are confronted in front of officials. Forged by the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) in Rajasthan, India, in the 1990s and later embedded in law through India's national employment guarantee programme (MGNREGA), the social audit turns the right to information into a tool for exposing corruption and securing redress. | The Community Scorecard (CSC) is a participatory social-accountability tool for community-based monitoring of public services, in which both the users and the providers of a service rate its performance and then meet face to face to agree improvements. Developed by CARE in Malawi in the early 2000s and widely disseminated by the World Bank, it operates at the local facility level — a clinic, school, or water point — and is qualitative and dialogue-driven, generating immediate, actionable feedback rather than statistically representative ratings. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|