Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Validade de Construto de Forma Curta× | Análise Fatorial Confirmatória (AFC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Psicometria | Psicometria |
| Família | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1969 |
| Autor original≠ | Multiple contributors; Smith, McCarthy, & Anderson (2000) formalized short-form validation criteria | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Tipo≠ | Validity assessment / scale shortening | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | abbreviated scale construct validity, short-form scale validation, brief scale validity, short measure construct validation | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | Short form construct validity is the systematic evaluation of whether an abbreviated version of a psychological scale still measures the same underlying construct as the original full-length instrument. It combines item selection procedures with confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity tests, and criterion-related evidence to demonstrate that scale shortening has not compromised the meaning of measurement. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|