Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Delineamento Misto Sequencial Qualitativo-Prioritário× | Design de Métodos Mistos com Prioridade Qualitativa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Delineamento de pesquisa | Delineamento de pesquisa |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies) |
| Autor original≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori | Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tipo | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Fonte seminal | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| Outros nomes | QUAL-priority sequential design, qualitative-dominant sequential design, qual-first sequential mixed methods, sequential exploratory qualitative-priority design | QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Sequential qualitative-priority mixed design is a two-phase mixed methods approach in which a qualitative strand is conducted first and carries greater weight in the overall study. The quantitative phase follows and serves to extend, test, or generalize the qualitative findings. The QUAL-first, QUAL-dominant logic makes this design well suited to exploratory research where theory or instruments are underdeveloped and must be grounded in participants' own words before being scaled up. | Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|