ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Self-Anchored Rating Scale×Target Complaint Scaling×
ÁreaSocial WorkSocial Work
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem20091966
Autor originalCodified in social-work practice evaluation by Bloom, Fischer & OrmeCarolyn C. Battle, Jerome D. Frank & colleagues (Johns Hopkins)
TipoIndividualized self-report rating scale with client-defined anchorsIndividualized outcome measure based on client-elicited presenting complaints
Fonte seminalBloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2009). Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. ISBN: 9780205458066Battle, C. C., Imber, S. D., Hoehn-Saric, R., Stone, A. R., Nash, E. R., & Frank, J. D. (1966). Target complaints as criteria of improvement. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 20(1), 184–192. DOI ↗
Outros nomesSARS, Self-Anchored Scale, Individualized Rating Scale, Client-Anchored ScaleTarget Complaints, Target Complaint Method, Battle Target Complaints, Target Problem Scaling
Relacionados44
ResumoA self-anchored rating scale (SARS) is an individualized measurement tool in which a client rates a personally relevant target — a feeling, thought, or behavior that may not be captured by any standardized instrument — on a fixed numeric scale whose points the client and worker have anchored in advance with concrete, individually meaningful descriptions. Widely taught in social-work practice evaluation through Bloom, Fischer, and Orme's work, it lets a worker measure highly idiosyncratic internal states repeatedly and reliably, supplying the data for single-system designs when no off-the-shelf scale fits.Target complaint scaling is an individualized outcome measure in which the client names the specific complaints that brought them to treatment, each complaint is rated for severity at the outset and again at follow-up, and the change in those ratings indexes improvement. Introduced by Carolyn Battle, Jerome Frank, and colleagues at Johns Hopkins in 1966, it grounds outcome measurement in the client's own presenting problems rather than a fixed questionnaire, making it an early and influential model for person-centered, idiographic outcome assessment in psychotherapy and social work.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Self-Anchored Rating Scale · Target Complaint Scaling. Recuperado em 2026-06-25 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare