ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Rough-TOPSIS×Importância dos Critérios Através da Correlação Intercritérios×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem20131995
Autor originalSong, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TipoRough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U)Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Fonte seminalSong, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z. (2013). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados88
ResumoROUGH-TOPSIS (Rough-TOPSIS — Rough extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Song, W. Ming, X. Wu, Z. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: ROUGH-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare