ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Cox Proportional Hazards com Ajuste de Risco×Teste Log-Rank para Comparação de Curvas de Sobrevivência×
ÁreaEpidemiologiaAnálise de sobrevivência
FamíliaProcess / pipelineSurvival analysis
Ano de origem1972 (Cox model); risk adjustment widespread from 1980s1966
Autor originalD. R. Cox (base model); risk-adjustment as routine practice formalised through clinical epidemiology literature from the 1980s onwardMantel, N.
TipoMultivariable survival regressionNon-parametric hypothesis test
Fonte seminalCox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗Mantel, N. (1966). Evaluation of Survival Data and Two New Rank Order Statistics Arising in Its Consideration. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports, 50(3), 163–170. link ↗
Outros nomesadjusted Cox regression, multivariable Cox model, covariate-adjusted survival analysis, risk-adjusted survival modelMantel log-rank test, Mantel-Cox test, log-rank sağkalım testi, Log-Rank Testi
Relacionados52
ResumoRisk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression extends the classical Cox (1972) survival model by simultaneously entering known confounders — age, sex, comorbidities, disease severity — into the model alongside the exposure of primary interest. This adjustment isolates the independent effect of the exposure on the hazard of an event, producing hazard ratios (HRs) that are not distorted by baseline differences between comparison groups. It is the most widely used method for multivariable survival analysis in clinical and epidemiological research.The log-rank test, developed by Nathan Mantel in 1966, is a non-parametric hypothesis test that compares the overall survival experience of two or more groups throughout the entire follow-up period. It is the standard companion to Kaplan-Meier curves and determines whether observed differences between curves are statistically meaningful.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Risk-adjusted Cox Proportional Hazards · Log-Rank Test. Recuperado em 2026-06-20 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare