ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Estudo de Coorte com Ajuste de Risco×Propensity Score Matching×
ÁreaEpidemiologiaEstatística para pesquisa
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origemMid–late 20th century (risk-adjusted cohort designs systematized by 1970s–1990s)1983
Autor originalEvolution of cohort study methodology; risk adjustment formalized through work of Rothman, Greenland, and others in epidemiology, 20th centuryPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipoObservational epidemiological study design with statistical confounding controlMethod
Fonte seminalRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Outros nomesadjusted cohort study, covariate-adjusted cohort, risk-controlled prospective study, propensity-adjusted cohortPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Relacionados43
ResumoA risk-adjusted cohort study is an observational epidemiological design in which a defined group of individuals is followed over time to compare outcomes between exposed and unexposed subgroups, with statistical methods applied to control for measured confounders. Adjustment strategies — including multivariable regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability weighting, or standardization — are used to reduce bias and produce effect estimates that more closely approximate what would be observed in a randomized trial.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Risk-adjusted cohort study · Propensity Score Matching. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare