ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Response to Intervention×Curriculum-Based Measurement×
ÁreaEducationEducation
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem20061985
Autor originalSpecial education / school psychology field (Deno; Fuchs & Fuchs; Vaughn)Stanley Deno and colleagues (University of Minnesota)
TipoTiered framework for screening, intervention, and learning-disability identificationStandardized, repeated brief measures for monitoring academic progress
Fonte seminalFuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. DOI ↗Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219–232. DOI ↗
Outros nomesRTI, RtI, Multi-Tiered System of Supports, MTSSCBM, Curriculum-Based Progress Monitoring, General Outcome Measurement, CBM Probes
Relacionados44
ResumoResponse to intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered framework for preventing academic failure and identifying students with learning disabilities by their responsiveness to high-quality instruction. All students are screened and taught with evidence-based core instruction; those who fall behind receive progressively more intensive intervention while their progress is closely monitored. Students who fail to respond even to intensive, well-implemented intervention are flagged as needing further evaluation. RTI reframes disability identification from a static test discrepancy to a dynamic question of who does not respond to good teaching.Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a standardized system of brief, repeated assessments used to monitor a student's academic progress over time. Developed by Stanley Deno and colleagues at the University of Minnesota, CBM uses short, technically adequate probes — such as one-minute oral reading fluency or math computation samples — sampled from the year's curriculum at a fixed difficulty. Scores are charted week by week, and the slope of improvement is compared against a goal line to judge whether instruction is working and to trigger timely changes.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Response to Intervention · Curriculum-Based Measurement. Recuperado em 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare