ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Regulatory Impact Assessment×Government Trust Survey×
ÁreaPublic AdministrationPublic Administration
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem20082017
Autor originalOECD (Regulatory Policy programme)OECD (Trust in Government programme)
TipoEx ante policy appraisal frameworkPopulation survey instrument for institutional trust
Fonte seminalOECD (2008). Building an Institutional Framework for Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA): Guidance for Policy Makers. Paris: OECD Publishing. link ↗OECD (2017). Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. Trust in Government. link ↗
Outros nomesRegulatory Impact Analysis, RIA, Impact Assessment of Regulation, Better Regulation Impact AssessmentTrust in Government Survey, Public Trust Measurement, Institutional Trust Survey, Confidence in Public Institutions Survey
Relacionados44
ResumoRegulatory impact assessment (RIA) is a systematic, ex ante framework for appraising the likely consequences of a proposed regulation before it is adopted, so that policymakers choose the option that delivers the greatest net benefit to society. Promoted internationally by the OECD as a cornerstone of regulatory quality and 'better regulation,' RIA requires governments to define the problem clearly, identify a full range of options including non-regulatory alternatives, weigh their costs and benefits, consult affected parties, recommend the preferred option, and plan for monitoring. The aim is to replace reflexive rule-making with evidence-based, transparent and proportionate regulation.A government trust survey is a population-based survey instrument for measuring how much citizens trust their public institutions and identifying the drivers of that trust. Building on the OECD's Trust in Government work, modern instruments treat trust not as a single mood but as a set of measurable expectations: that government is competent and reliable in delivering services, and that it acts on values such as integrity, openness, fairness and responsiveness. By surveying a representative sample of the population, weighting responses to the population, and analyzing trust alongside its drivers, the method produces comparable indicators that diagnose where and why public trust is high or low and what policy levers might raise it.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Regulatory Impact Assessment · Government Trust Survey. Recuperado em 2026-06-25 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare