Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Regulatory Impact Analysis× | Ex-Ante Policy Appraisal× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1995 | 2022 |
| Autor original≠ | Government regulatory-reform practice; standardised by the OECD | Public-finance appraisal tradition; codified by HM Treasury (Green Book) |
| Tipo≠ | Systematic ex-ante appraisal of proposed regulation | Structured ex-ante appraisal of policy options |
| Fonte seminal≠ | OECD (2020). Regulatory Impact Assessment, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI ↗ | HM Treasury (2022). The Green Book: Central Government Guidance on Appraisal and Evaluation. London: HM Treasury. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes | RIA, Regulatory Impact Assessment, Impact Assessment of Regulation | Policy Appraisal, Options Appraisal, Green Book Appraisal |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | Regulatory impact analysis (RIA) is a systematic process for appraising the likely costs, benefits and effects of proposed regulation before it is adopted. Promoted by the OECD as a cornerstone of good regulatory governance, it requires governments to define the problem a regulation is meant to solve, set out alternative options including non-regulatory ones, assess the impacts of each against a do-nothing baseline, consult affected parties, and recommend the option that delivers the greatest net benefit. RIA aims to ensure that new rules are evidence-based, proportionate and justified rather than imposed without examination of their consequences. | Ex-ante policy appraisal is the structured assessment of the costs, benefits, risks and trade-offs of alternative options for achieving a policy objective, carried out before a decision is taken. Codified in guidance such as the UK Treasury's Green Book, it provides a disciplined framework for deciding whether to intervene and, if so, how — by establishing the rationale and objectives, generating and narrowing a range of options, appraising each against a counterfactual, and recommending the option that offers best value for public money. Appraisal is the forward-looking complement to ex-post evaluation, which judges interventions after they have run. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|