Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Delineamento de Métodos Mistos Pragmatico com Dominância Quantitativa× | Design de Métodos Mistos de Triangulação Concorrente× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Delineamento de pesquisa | Delineamento de pesquisa |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1998–2010 | 2007 (formally named in Creswell & Plano Clark, 1st ed.) |
| Autor original≠ | Tashakkori & Teddlie (mixed methods paradigm discourse); pragmatic strand systematized by Morgan and Creswell | John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| Tipo | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975179 |
| Outros nomes≠ | QUAN-dominant pragmatic MMR, pragmatic quantitative-priority mixed design, quan-priority pragmatic design | convergent parallel design, triangulation design, QUAN+QUAL concurrent design, simultaneous triangulation |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Resumo≠ | A mixed methods design in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight while a smaller qualitative component provides contextual depth. Grounded in philosophical pragmatism, design decisions — including timing, sequencing, and the scope of each strand — are driven by what best answers the research question rather than by adherence to a single paradigmatic tradition. | The concurrent triangulation mixed methods design collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously, analyzes each strand independently, and then merges the results to assess whether the two data sources corroborate one another. Often called the convergent parallel design, it is one of the foundational configurations in mixed methods research and is chosen specifically when the researcher wants to cross-validate or triangulate findings from two distinct methodological traditions. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|