ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Delineamento Pragmatic Solomon Four-Group×Desenho Experimental com Grupo de Controle×
ÁreaDelineamento experimentalDelineamento experimental
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem1949 (Solomon design); pragmatic variant in applied use from 1990s onward1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification)
Autor originalSolomon four-group design: Richard L. Solomon (1949); pragmatic orientation formalized by Schwartz & Lellouch (1967) and Thorpe et al. (2009)Ronald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley
TipoExperimental design (pragmatic variant)Experimental research design
Fonte seminalSolomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗
Outros nomespragmatic S4GD, real-world Solomon four-group design, pragmatic pretest-control design, pragmatic Solomon designcontrolled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design
Relacionados54
ResumoThe Pragmatic Solomon Four-Group Design combines the pretest-sensitization control logic of the classic Solomon (1949) four-group structure with the broad eligibility, flexible delivery, and real-world conditions characteristic of pragmatic trials. Four groups are formed: two receive the intervention (one pretested, one not) and two serve as controls (one pretested, one not), allowing simultaneous estimation of treatment effects and pretest sensitization effects under ecologically valid settings.Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Pragmatic Solomon Four-Group Design · Control Group Experimental Design. Recuperado em 2026-06-19 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare