Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Escala de Populismo× | Escala de Ideologia Política× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Psicologia política | Psicologia política |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2014 | 1990 |
| Autor original≠ | Matthijs Bukkerman, Cas Mudde, Andrej Zaslaysky | Hans-Dieter Klingemann & Norberto Bobbio |
| Tipo | Self-report | Self-report |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslaysky, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324-1353. DOI ↗ | Fuchs, D., & Klingemann, H. D. (1990). The left-right schema. In M. Kent Jennings & Jan W. Van Deth (Eds.), Continuities in political action. Berlin: De Gruyter. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes | PAS, Akkerman Populism Scale, Populist Attitudes Measure | Left-Right Scale, Ideology Continuum, Political Spectrum Scale |
| Relacionados | 3 | 3 |
| Resumo≠ | The Populism Attitudes Scale measures individual propensity toward populist political orientations, including Manichean worldview (pure people vs. corrupt elites), belief in popular sovereignty, and anti-elitism. Developed by Akkerman, Mudde, and Zaslaysky (2014), the eight-item scale distinguishes populist attitudes from left-right ideology, authoritarian attitudes, and distrust of institutions. It captures voters' susceptibility to populist political messaging across left-wing and right-wing populist movements globally, from Latin American left-populism to European right-wing populism. | The Political Ideology Scale measures individual self-placement on a left-right political spectrum, capturing fundamental preferences for government role, economic organization, and social values. The single-item self-placement measure (most common) asks respondents to rate themselves on a 0-10 or 0-100 continuum; multi-item versions assess distinct ideological dimensions (economic policy, social policy, nationalism). The left-right axis remains the dominant organizing principle of political competition globally, predicting party choice, policy preferences, and electoral behavior despite critiques that it oversimplifies multidimensional political space. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|