ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

PCA Weighting×Método Alternativo de Ordenação por Ranking com Normalização em Duas Etapas×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem19012022
Autor originalPearson, K.Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
TipoWeight_Objective (PCA variance explained, eigenvector-based)Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Fonte seminalPearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine DOI ↗Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering link ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados88
ResumoPCA-WEIGHT (PCA Weighting — Principal Component Analysis based objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pearson, K. in 1901. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: PCA-WEIGHT · AROMAN. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare