Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Etnografia Institucional Participativa× | Teoria Fundamentada× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área≠ | Qualitativo | Pesquisa qualitativa |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1967 |
| Autor original≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (IE); participatory variant developed by Janet Rankin, Marie Campbell, and others in health and social sciences | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative research design | Method |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | participatory IE, community-based institutional ethnography, collaborative institutional ethnography | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumo≠ | Participatory Institutional Ethnography (PIE) combines Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography with participatory research principles, positioning community members or service users as co-researchers who investigate how institutional relations, ruling texts, and organizational practices shape and often constrain their everyday lives. The approach aims both to produce knowledge about institutional coordination and to generate actionable change through collaborative inquiry. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|