Comparar métodos

	Etnografia Institucional Participativa	Etnografia Crítica
Área	Qualitativo	Qualitativo
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	1990s–2000s	Late 20th century (~1980s–1993 systematisation)
Autor original	Dorothy E. Smith (IE); participatory variant developed by Janet Rankin, Marie Campbell, and others in health and social sciences	Jim Thomas (systematised); rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory (Adorno, Horkheimer) and feminist/postcolonial traditions
Tipo	Qualitative research design	Qualitative research method
Fonte seminal	Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010	Thomas, J. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage Publications.
Outros nomes	participatory IE, community-based institutional ethnography, collaborative institutional ethnography	critical ethnographic research, critical qualitative ethnography, advocacy ethnography, emancipatory ethnography
Relacionados	6	6
Resumo	Participatory Institutional Ethnography (PIE) combines Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography with participatory research principles, positioning community members or service users as co-researchers who investigate how institutional relations, ruling texts, and organizational practices shape and often constrain their everyday lives. The approach aims both to produce knowledge about institutional coordination and to generate actionable change through collaborative inquiry.	Critical ethnography is a qualitative research approach that combines sustained fieldwork immersion with explicit critical theory to examine how power, inequality, and ideology shape the lived experiences of marginalised communities. Unlike conventional ethnography, which aims to describe a culture as it is, critical ethnography commits the researcher to questioning what is taken for granted and to producing knowledge that can serve as a resource for social change. Rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory and expanded through feminist, postcolonial, and race-critical traditions, it treats the research process itself as a political act.