Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Net-Map (Influence Network Mapping)× | Ethnographic Interview× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Anthropology | Anthropology |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2010 | 1979 |
| Autor original≠ | Eva Schiffer (with Jennifer Hauck) | James P. Spradley |
| Tipo≠ | Participatory tool for collecting social/influence network data and facilitating learning | Structured developmental sequence of interview questions for eliciting cultural knowledge |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Schiffer, E., & Hauck, J. (2010). Net-Map: collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods, 22(3), 231–249. DOI ↗ | Spradley, J. P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 9780030444968 |
| Outros nomes | Net-Map, Influence Network Mapping, Participatory Influence Mapping, Influence Tower Mapping | Spradley Interview, Developmental Research Sequence Interview, Ethnographic Interviewing, Domain Elicitation Interview |
| Relacionados | 3 | 3 |
| Resumo≠ | Net-Map is a participatory, paper-based tool developed by Eva Schiffer for collecting social and influence network data while helping participants reflect on the networks they are part of. Sitting around a large sheet, participants name the actors involved in a goal or process, draw and label the links between them by type (for example funding, information, or command), and then stack physical 'influence towers' — disks or blocks — beside each actor to show how much power that actor holds. The session produces both a rich qualitative discussion and a quantitative, analyzable network with weighted nodes and typed, directed ties. | The ethnographic interview, formalized by James Spradley, is a deliberately staged conversation whose goal is to discover how an insider categorizes and talks about their own cultural world rather than to test the researcher's categories. It proceeds through a developmental research sequence of question types — broad grand-tour questions, fine-grained descriptive questions, structural questions that probe how knowledge is organized, and contrast questions that surface the distinctions informants draw between terms. The point is not a list of facts but a reconstructed map of meanings expressed in the informant's own native terms. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|