Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Extensão neutrosófica do TOPSIS× | Processo de Hierarquia Analítica× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Tomada de decisão | Tomada de decisão |
| Família | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2016 | 1980 |
| Autor original≠ | Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Tipo≠ | Neutrosophic outranking/ranking — Single-Valued Neutrosophic Set (SVNS: T, I, F; T,I,F ∈ [0,1], T+I+F ≤ 3) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. (2016). TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Neural Computing and Applications DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Outros nomes | — | — |
| Relacionados | 8 | 8 |
| Resumo≠ | N-TOPSIS (Neutrosophic extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Biswas, P., Pramanik, S., Giri, B. C. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|