Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Análise Temática Reflexiva Múltipla Baseada em Casos× | Teoria Fundamentada× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área≠ | Qualitativo | Pesquisa qualitativa |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2006 (RTA origins); 2010s onward (combined application) | 1967 |
| Autor original≠ | Braun & Clarke (reflexive thematic analysis); Yin (multiple case study framework) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative research design and analysis approach | Method |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953246 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | MC-RTA, multi-case reflexive thematic analysis, cross-case reflexive thematic analysis, multiple case RTA | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Relacionados≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Resumo≠ | Multiple case-based reflexive thematic analysis integrates Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) with a multiple case study framework. Qualitative data are collected from two or more bounded cases, RTA is applied within each case to generate case-specific themes, and the themes are then compared and synthesised across cases. The approach preserves the depth and interpretive richness of RTA while enabling cross-case pattern recognition that single-case designs cannot provide. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|