Comparar métodos

	Multidimensional Unfolding	Roll-Call Analysis
Área	Political Science	Political Science
Família	Latent structure	Latent structure
Ano de origem	2000	—
Autor original	Keith T. Poole (nonparametric optimal classification and unfolding)	Spatial-voting tradition; Poole, Rosenthal, Clinton, Jackman, Rivers
Tipo	Latent-space scaling model placing individuals and stimuli in a joint space	Scaling and analysis of legislative binary-choice data
Fonte seminal	Poole, K. T. (2000). Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data. Political Analysis, 8(3), 211–237.	Poole, K. T. (2000). Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data. Political Analysis, 8(3), 211–237.
Outros nomes	Unfolding analysis, Optimal classification, Preference unfolding, Joint-space scaling	Roll call voting analysis, Legislative vote scaling, Roll-call scaling, Optimal classification of votes
Relacionados	5	3
Resumo	Multidimensional unfolding places both individuals and the stimuli they evaluate — candidates, parties, bills — in a single joint low-dimensional space, so that each person's preferences are explained by their proximity to the stimuli. In political science it underlies Keith Poole's nonparametric optimal classification of roll-call votes and the unfolding of thermometer ratings and rank orders, recovering legislators' and bills' positions from nothing but the pattern of choices. Unlike correlation-based scaling, unfolding treats preference as a single-peaked function of distance: you like what is close to you and dislike what is far.	Roll-call analysis is the study of recorded legislative votes to recover the structure of political conflict — the ideological positions of legislators, the dimensionality of the issue space, and the cohesion of parties. It encompasses parametric spatial and item-response models that estimate latent ideal points, nonparametric scaling such as optimal classification that maximizes correctly classified votes without distributional assumptions, and descriptive cohesion statistics like the Rice index. Together these tools turn a matrix of yea/nay votes into a map of who agrees with whom and why.