ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Estudo multicêntrico de acurácia diagnóstica×Estudo de coorte multicêntrico×
ÁreaEpidemiologiaEpidemiologia
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem2003 (STARD statement first published; updated 2015)Mid-to-late 20th century (widespread adoption 1970s–1990s)
Autor originalSTARD Group (Bossuyt, Reitsma et al.)Developed incrementally through large collaborative epidemiological projects (e.g., Framingham Heart Study consortium expansions, 1948 onward; EPIC study, 1992)
TipoObservational diagnostic study designObservational longitudinal study
Fonte seminalBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., Kressel, H. Y., Rifai, N., Golub, R. M., Altman, D. G., Hooft, L., Korevaar, D. A., & Cohen, J. F. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Outros nomesmultisite diagnostic accuracy study, multicenter DTA study, multicenter index test evaluation, STARD multicenter studymultisite cohort study, multi-centre cohort, collaborative cohort study, pooled cohort study
Relacionados56
ResumoA multicenter diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test (e.g., a biomarker, imaging modality, or clinical prediction rule) identifies a target condition when conducted across two or more independent clinical sites. By recruiting patients from diverse settings, it produces estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios that are more externally valid than those obtained from a single center, and it enables explicit assessment of how test performance varies across sites, patient populations, and operator skill levels.A multicenter cohort study follows defined groups of participants at two or more geographically or institutionally distinct sites over time to estimate incidence, identify risk factors, and quantify associations between exposures and outcomes. By pooling data from multiple centers, it achieves statistical power and population diversity that single-site designs cannot match, making it the workhorse of large-scale epidemiological and clinical research.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Multicenter cohort study. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare