ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Amostragem Ponderada Multinível×Amostra Ponderada×
ÁreaMetodologia de surveyMetodologia de survey
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem1960s–1980s (developed alongside large-scale survey programs)1940s–1952 (formalized in large-scale government survey work and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator)
Autor originalLeslie Kish (probability sampling theory); complex survey methodologistsMorris H. Hansen, William N. Hurwitz; D. G. Horvitz and D. J. Thompson (theoretical framework)
TipoProbability sampling designProbability sampling design
Fonte seminalKish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons. New York. ISBN: 978-0471109495Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0471162407
Outros nomeshierarchical weighted sampling, nested weighted sampling, multilevel probability weighting, weighted hierarchical samplingprobability proportional to size sampling, PPS sampling, unequal probability sampling, importance sampling
Relacionados66
ResumoMulti-level weighted sampling is a probability-based survey design that draws samples from hierarchically nested populations — such as students within classrooms within schools within districts — and assigns design weights at each level to account for unequal selection probabilities. The resulting weighted data enable unbiased population-level inference despite the complex, non-proportional structure of the sampling frame. It is the backbone of major international assessments such as PISA and TIMSS.Weighted sampling is a probability-based design in which units are selected with unequal probabilities proportional to a known auxiliary measure of size or importance. Sampling weights — the inverse of inclusion probabilities — are applied during analysis so that each sampled unit correctly represents the population units it stands for. The approach underpins large-scale government, health, and social surveys where simple random sampling would be inefficient.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Multi-level weighted sampling · Weighted Sampling. Recuperado em 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare