Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Moral Foundations Questionnaire× | Need for Closure Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Psicologia política | Psicologia política |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2011 | 1994 |
| Autor original≠ | Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al. | Donna M. Webster & Arie W. Kruglanski |
| Tipo≠ | Self-report values inventory | Self-report individual-difference scale |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366-385. DOI ↗ | Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049-1062. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | MFQ, MFQ-30, Moral Foundations Theory Questionnaire | NFCS, Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, Webster-Kruglanski Scale |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) is a 30-item self-report instrument developed by Graham, Haidt and colleagues (2011) to measure the degree to which people rely on five intuitive moral foundations: Care/harm, Fairness/cheating, Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Sanctity/degradation. It is the standard operationalization of Moral Foundations Theory, which argues that political and cultural moral disagreements arise from differing weights placed on these foundations. | The Need for Cognitive Closure Scale, developed by Webster and Kruglanski (1994), measures a stable individual difference in the desire for a firm, definite answer to a question and an aversion to ambiguity and uncertainty. High need for closure is a key epistemic-motivation construct in political psychology, linked to conservatism, prejudice, intolerance of dissent, and resistance to belief change. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|