Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Escala de Racismo Moderno× | Inventário de Sexismo Ambivalente× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Psicologia social | Psicologia social |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1986 | 1996 |
| Autor original≠ | John B. McConahay | Peter Glick and Susan T. Fiske |
| Tipo | Self-report Likert scale | Self-report Likert scale |
| Fonte seminal≠ | McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). Academic Press. link ↗ | Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | MRS | ASI |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | The Modern Racism Scale (MRS) is a 7-item self-report measure developed by John B. McConahay in 1986 to assess subtle, contemporary forms of racial prejudice. Rather than measuring overt hostility, the MRS captures attitudes reflecting the belief that discrimination no longer exists and that racial minorities make illegitimate demands. The scale addresses limitations of earlier instruments by focusing on modern manifestations of racial bias. | The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) is a 22-item self-report measure developed by Peter Glick and Susan T. Fiske in 1996 to assess both hostile and benevolent sexism toward women. The scale captures the dual nature of sexism: overtly antagonistic attitudes and paternalistic but ultimately restrictive attitudes that present themselves as protective. It has become widely used in gender studies and organizational research. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|