Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Anotações de Campo Móveis× | Diário de Pesquisa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Metodologia de survey | Metodologia de survey |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2000s–2010s (digital turn in ethnography) | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology |
| Autor original≠ | Emergent from digital ethnography practice; theorised notably by Sarah Pink and colleagues | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative data collection technique | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-1446287972 | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes | digital field notes, smartphone field notes, mobile ethnographic notes, in-situ digital notes | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Mobile Field Notes is a data collection technique in which researchers use smartphones, tablets, or wearable devices to record observations, reflections, photographs, audio, or video in real time during fieldwork. By capturing data at the moment and place of occurrence, the method reduces recall bias and enables richer, contextually anchored documentation compared with traditional pen-and-paper notes written retrospectively. | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|