ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Mixed-Use Index×Urban Sprawl Measurement×
ÁreaUrban StudiesUrban Studies
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem19972014
Autor originalCervero & Kockelman (land-use diversity / 3Ds); Frank et al. (entropy walkability term)Reid Ewing & Shima Hamidi (building on Galster et al.)
TipoIndex of how evenly land uses are mixed within an areaComposite index combining multiple dimensions of urban form into a sprawl/compactness score
Fonte seminalCervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. DOI ↗Ewing, R., & Hamidi, S. (2015). Compactness versus sprawl: A review of recent evidence from the United States. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 413–432. DOI ↗
Outros nomesLand-Use Mix Entropy, Land-Use Diversity Index, Herfindahl Land-Use Index, Entropy Land-Use MixSprawl Index, Compactness Index of Sprawl, Ewing Sprawl Index, Composite Sprawl Measure
Relacionados44
ResumoA mixed-use index measures how evenly different land uses — residential, retail, office, civic, industrial — are blended within an area, turning the planning ideal of vibrant, walkable mixed-use districts into a number. The dominant formulation borrows the entropy measure from information theory: a value near zero when one use dominates and near one when uses are perfectly balanced. Popularised through the 'density, diversity, design' framework of Cervero and Kockelman and embedded in walkability indices by Frank and colleagues, these indices quantify land-use diversity for studies of travel behaviour, walkability and urban vitality.Urban sprawl measurement quantifies how compact or sprawling a metropolitan region is by combining several distinct dimensions of urban form into a single composite index. The dominant approach, developed by Reid Ewing, Shima Hamidi and colleagues, captures four factors — development density, land-use mix, activity centering, and street-network connectivity — and folds standardized indicators of each into one score, calibrated so the average region equals 100 and higher values mean greater compactness. Because sprawl is multidimensional, no single variable such as density adequately describes it, which is why the composite-index strategy has become the standard for comparing regions and linking form to outcomes.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Mixed-Use Index · Urban Sprawl Measurement. Recuperado em 2026-06-25 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare