Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Número Mínimo de Indivíduos× | Número de Espécimes Identificados× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Arqueologia | Arqueologia |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1953 | 1971 |
| Autor original≠ | Theodore White | R. E. Chaplin |
| Tipo | Faunal quantification method | Faunal quantification method |
| Fonte seminal≠ | White, T. E. (1953). A method of calculating the dietary percentages of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity, 19(4), 396-398. DOI ↗ | Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes | MNI method, minimum individual number | NISP method, specimen count |
| Relacionados | 4 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | Minimum number of individuals (MNI) is a quantitative zooarchaeological method that estimates the minimum number of animals represented in a faunal assemblage based on the frequency of unique skeletal elements. Developed by Theodore White in 1953, it is one of the most widely used techniques for analyzing animal bone assemblages from archaeological sites. The MNI method helps archaeologists understand hunting and butchering patterns, interpret subsistence practices, and assess the diversity of fauna exploited by past human populations. | Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|