ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Ensaio Clínico Randomizado Meta-analítico×Meta-análise de Rede×
ÁreaEpidemiologiaSíntese de evidências
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem1976 (Glass coinage of meta-analysis); 1993 (Cochrane Collaboration formalization)2002
Autor originalGene V. Glass (meta-analysis method); Cochrane Collaboration (systematic RCT pooling standards)Lumley (2002)
TipoQuantitative evidence-synthesis designMethod
Fonte seminalHiggins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 978-1119536628Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗
Outros nomesmeta-analytic RCT, MA-RCT, meta-analysis of RCTs, pooled randomized trial analysisMixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis
Relacionados31
ResumoA meta-analytic randomized clinical trial is a formal evidence-synthesis method that identifies, appraises, and statistically combines the results of multiple randomized clinical trials addressing the same clinical question. By pooling trial-level data, it produces a single, more precise estimate of treatment effect and quantifies between-trial heterogeneity, sitting at the apex of the evidence hierarchy for evaluating healthcare interventions.Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Meta-analytic Randomized Clinical Trial · Network Meta-Analysis. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare