Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Coeficiente de Correlação de Matthews× | Sensibilidade× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Avaliação de modelos | Avaliação de modelos |
| Família | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1975 | 20th century |
| Autor original≠ | Brian W. Matthews | Historical statistical foundations |
| Tipo | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451. DOI ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | Phi Coefficient, Binary Classification Correlation | Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR |
| Relacionados | 5 | 5 |
| Resumo≠ | The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets. | Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|