ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Estudo Epidemiológico Transversal Pareado×Estudo de Coorte Pareada×
ÁreaEpidemiologiaEpidemiologia
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origemMid-to-late 20th century (formalized ~1970s–1990s)Mid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983
Autor originalDeveloped within the tradition of observational epidemiology; matching principles codified by Greenland, Rothman, and Kelsey in modern epidemiology textsEstablished practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
TipoObservational epidemiological study designObservational analytic study design
Fonte seminalRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Outros nomesmatched cross-sectional survey, matched prevalence study, matched cross-sectional design, frequency-matched cross-sectional studymatched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study
Relacionados55
ResumoA matched cross-sectional epidemiological study is an observational design that measures exposure and outcome simultaneously in a population sample while applying matching to control for one or more confounding variables. By pairing or grouping participants on key characteristics such as age, sex, or socioeconomic status before or during analysis, the design reduces confounding bias without requiring longitudinal follow-up, making it efficient for estimating prevalence and cross-sectional associations.A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Matched Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study · Matched Cohort Study. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare