ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Estimador de Pareamento Aumentado por Aprendizado de Máquina×Propensity Score Matching×
ÁreaInferência causalEstatística para pesquisa
FamíliaRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem2006–20181983
Autor originalAbadie & Imbens (classical matching); Chernozhukov et al. (ML augmentation framework)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TipoCausal inference / nonparametric matchingMethod
Fonte seminalChernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Outros nomesML-augmented matching, ML matching estimator, high-dimensional matching estimator, data-adaptive matching estimatorPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Relacionados53
ResumoThe machine learning-augmented matching estimator combines classical nearest-neighbor or propensity-score matching with ML algorithms — such as lasso, random forests, or gradient boosting — to select covariates, estimate propensity scores, and correct for residual bias. The result is a matching-based causal estimator that remains valid under high-dimensional confounding where traditional hand-specified matching fails.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Machine Learning-Augmented Matching Estimator · Propensity Score Matching. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare