Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Método de História Oral Longitudinal× | Método de História Oral× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Métodos de campo | Métodos de campo |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1970s–1980s (systematic formulation); longstanding practice in oral history | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| Autor original≠ | Paul Thompson; developed further by Ken Plummer and oral history practitioners | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Thompson, P. (2000). The Voice of the Past: Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0192893468 | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| Outros nomes | repeated oral history interviewing, longitudinal life history, serial oral history, longitudinal biographical interviewing | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| Relacionados≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Longitudinal oral history method is a qualitative research design in which the same participants are interviewed repeatedly over an extended period — months or years — using oral history interviewing techniques. By returning to narrators across time, researchers can trace how personal accounts, identities, and interpretations of experience shift and evolve, capturing the processual and biographical dimensions of social life that a single interview cannot reveal. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|