ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Normalização Linear Máxima×Avaliação Proporcional Complexa×
ÁreaTomada de decisãoTomada de decisão
FamíliaMCDMMCDM
Ano de origem19671996
Autor originalFishburn, P. C.Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.
TipoNormalization (linear-max, ratio-based)Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)
Fonte seminalFishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments. Operations Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗
Outros nomes
Relacionados48
ResumoLINEAR-MAX-NORMALIZATION (Linear Max Normalization — division by column maximum (benefit) or column minimum over value (cost)) is a normalization multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fishburn, P. C. in 1967. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: LINEAR-MAX-NORMALIZATION · COPRAS. Recuperado em 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare