Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Grounded Theory Clássica Interpretativa× | Teoria Fundamentada Interpretativa× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Qualitativo | Qualitativo |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1967 (classic GT); interpretivist epistemological framing: mid-1990s onward | 1967 (foundational); interpretivist articulation ~2000–2006 |
| Autor original≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); interpretivist framing elaborated by Merilyn Annells and others | Kathy Charmaz (interpretivist/constructivist strand); foundational grounded theory by Glaser & Strauss |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative theory-building method | Qualitative research methodology |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| Outros nomes | interpretivist CGT, interpretivist classic GT, interpretive Glaserian grounded theory, interpretive emergent grounded theory | interpretivist grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory, IGT, grounded theory — interpretivist strand |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Interpretive classic grounded theory applies Glaser and Strauss's original discovery-oriented grounded theory procedures under an explicitly interpretivist epistemology. It retains classic GT's commitment to theory emergence — avoiding forced conceptual frameworks — while acknowledging that the researcher's interpretive lens shapes what is noticed and how meaning is constructed from data. This stance distinguishes it from purely objectivist readings of Glaser's later solo work and from constructivist grounded theory in its degree of inductive openness. | Interpretive grounded theory is a qualitative methodology that builds substantive theory inductively from data while working from an interpretivist epistemological stance. Developed most fully by Kathy Charmaz, it holds that researcher and participant co-construct meaning, that categories are created rather than discovered, and that the resulting theory is one plausible account among others rather than an objective rendering of social reality. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|