Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Análise Transcultural HRAF× | Número Mínimo de Indivíduos× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Arqueologia | Arqueologia |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1967 | 1953 |
| Autor original≠ | George Murdock | Theodore White |
| Tipo≠ | Ethnographic comparison | Faunal quantification method |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press. link ↗ | White, T. E. (1953). A method of calculating the dietary percentages of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity, 19(4), 396-398. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | cross-cultural comparison, comparative ethnography | MNI method, minimum individual number |
| Relacionados≠ | 2 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | HRAF (Human Relations Area Files) cross-cultural analysis compares ethnographic data from diverse societies to identify patterns and test hypotheses about human social organization and cultural practices. Developed by George Murdock and colleagues, the method uses a standardized database of ethnographic information coded for comparative analysis. HRAF provides a framework for systematic cross-cultural comparison, helping archaeologists interpret prehistoric patterns through ethnographic analogy. | Minimum number of individuals (MNI) is a quantitative zooarchaeological method that estimates the minimum number of animals represented in a faunal assemblage based on the frequency of unique skeletal elements. Developed by Theodore White in 1953, it is one of the most widely used techniques for analyzing animal bone assemblages from archaeological sites. The MNI method helps archaeologists understand hunting and butchering patterns, interpret subsistence practices, and assess the diversity of fauna exploited by past human populations. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|