Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Pesquisa Arquivística Histórica× | Método de História Oral× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Métodos de campo | Métodos de campo |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 19th century (formalized ~1820s–1880s) | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| Autor original≠ | Historians and archivists; systematised through the professionalization of historical scholarship in the 19th century | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| Tipo≠ | Qualitative primary-source research | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0803951853 | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| Outros nomes | archival research, historical document analysis, archival history, primary source research | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| Relacionados | 6 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Historical archival research is a systematic method of investigating the past through the critical examination of primary source documents preserved in archives, libraries, and institutional collections. Researchers locate, access, authenticate, and interpret original records — such as government documents, correspondence, diaries, maps, and institutional files — to reconstruct events, trace processes, and build evidence-based historical arguments. It is foundational to historiography and widely applied across humanities and social science disciplines. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|