ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Gradient Boosting×Gradient Boosting Regularizado×Regularized LightGBM×
ÁreaAprendizado de máquinaAprendizado de máquinaAprendizado de máquina
FamíliaMachine learningMachine learningMachine learning
Ano de origem20012001 (gradient boosting); 2016 (explicit L1/L2 regularization in XGBoost)2017
Autor originalFriedman, J. H.Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (building on Friedman, J. H.)Ke, G. et al. (Microsoft Research)
TipoEnsemble (sequential boosting of decision trees)Regularized ensemble (additive tree model)Regularized gradient boosting ensemble
Fonte seminalFriedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232. DOI ↗Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. DOI ↗Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3146–3154. link ↗
Outros nomesGradient Boosting (GBM), GBM, gradient boosted trees, gradient boosting machinepenalized gradient boosting, shrinkage-regularized boosting, XGBoost-style regularization, L1/L2 gradient boostingLightGBM with L1/L2 regularization, penalized LightGBM, LightGBM ridge/lasso, regularized LGBM
Relacionados565
ResumoGradient Boosting is an ensemble learning method, formalised by Jerome H. Friedman in 2001, that combines a sequence of weak learners — typically shallow decision trees — so that each new tree is fitted to minimise the residual errors of the trees before it. It is the core algorithm behind popular implementations such as XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost.Regularized gradient boosting extends the classic additive tree ensemble (Friedman 2001) by embedding L1 and L2 penalty terms directly into the training objective, along with a complexity penalty on tree size. Popularized by XGBoost (Chen & Guestrin 2016), this framework reduces overfitting and improves generalization compared to unpenalized boosting, while retaining the method's characteristic accuracy on tabular data.Regularized LightGBM applies L1 (lasso) and L2 (ridge) penalty terms to the leaf weight objective of LightGBM — Microsoft's highly efficient gradient boosting framework — to control model complexity, reduce overfitting, and improve generalization on tabular classification and regression tasks with high-dimensional or noisy feature sets.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 1 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Gradient Boosting · Regularized Gradient Boosting · Regularized LightGBM. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare