Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Inventário de Benefício de Glasgow× | Instrumento de Capacitação do Paciente× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área≠ | Otorrinolaringologia | Cuidado centrado no paciente |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1996 | 1998 |
| Autor original≠ | Karol Robinson, Sophia Gatehouse, and Gordon G. Browning | J. G. Howie |
| Tipo≠ | Self-report | Patient-reported |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Robinson, K., Gatehouse, S., & Browning, G. G. (1996). Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and treatment. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 105(6), 415-422. DOI ↗ | Howie, J. G., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., & Zwanenberg, D. (1998). A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two other consultations outcome measures. British Journal of General Practice, 48(427), 1211-1216. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | GBI | PEI, Patient Enablement Score |
| Relacionados≠ | 3 | 4 |
| Resumo≠ | The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is an 18-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure change in health status and general well-being resulting from otolaryngologic intervention (surgery, medical treatment). Unlike generic health-related quality-of-life measures, the GBI is disease-specific, asking patients to compare their post-intervention status to their pre-intervention baseline. Developed by Robinson, Gatehouse, and Browning in 1996, the GBI has become the standard outcome measure for evaluating benefit from ear, nose, and throat surgery and treatment. | The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a brief, validated six-item questionnaire that measures the degree to which a clinical consultation leaves the patient feeling more capable of understanding and managing their health condition. Developed by Howie and colleagues in 1998, the PEI assesses whether the consultation helped the patient understand their problem, cope with their illness, and manage their health more effectively. The scale captures the empowering effect of good clinical practice and is widely used in general practice research, quality improvement, and studies evaluating patient-centered and collaborative consultation styles. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|