Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Genogram Analysis× | Goal Attainment Scaling× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Social Work | Social Work |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2008 | 1968 |
| Autor original≠ | Monica McGoldrick & Randy Gerson (standardized notation); Murray Bowen (theoretical roots) | Thomas J. Kiresuk & Robert E. Sherman |
| Tipo≠ | Graphical, qualitative family-assessment tool | Individualized, criterion-referenced outcome measurement procedure |
| Fonte seminal≠ | McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and Intervention (3rd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN: 9780393705096 | Kiresuk, T. J., & Sherman, R. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4(6), 443–453. DOI ↗ |
| Outros nomes | Genogram, Family Genogram, Family Diagram, McGoldrick Genogram | GAS, Goal Attainment Scale, Kiresuk-Sherman Goal Attainment Scaling, Individualized Goal Scaling |
| Relacionados | 3 | 3 |
| Resumo≠ | A genogram is a graphical map of a family across at least three generations that uses standardized symbols to record its structure, key biographical and medical events, and the quality of relationships among members. Genogram analysis is the practice of constructing such a map with a client and then interpreting it to reveal intergenerational patterns — of illness, relationships, roles, conflict, and resilience — that shape the presenting situation. Standardized by Monica McGoldrick and Randy Gerson and grounded in Bowen family-systems theory, it is a staple qualitative assessment tool in social work and family therapy. | Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method for measuring the outcomes of an individualized intervention by writing, in advance, a small set of client-specific goals and defining for each a graded scale of possible outcomes from much worse than expected to much better than expected. After the intervention, the actual outcome on each goal is scored on this scale and the scores are combined into a single standardized index, allowing idiosyncratic, personally meaningful goals to be aggregated and compared across clients and programs. It was introduced by Thomas Kiresuk and Robert Sherman in 1968 to evaluate community mental health programs. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|